I feel a lot better now that we've met with the breast surgeon! My husband went with me to this appointment, and it feels good to have a plan.
We covered so much information in this appointment. Here goes.
I will be getting a double mastectomy with no reconstruction. He will also remove 2-3 sentinel lymph nodes on each side for testing. (More details on that below.) The earliest available surgery date is likely to be in mid-August, but they will put me on a wait list for an earlier date. They will call me probably next week with the surgery date.
It sounded like the surgeon got involved starting with my
MRI report. He asked me to fill him in on everything up until the MRI. I dare say he expressed a bit of surprise when he learned that
two mammograms and
two ultrasounds did not detect either of my cancerous tumors. He said maybe the
sebaceous cyst was like my guardian angel, causing me to pay more attention to my breast and leading me to an earlier diagnosis. (Incidentally, at this point, the sebaceous cyst is no longer visible, and the palpable lump is much, much smaller. I'm not even sure if what I'm feeling is the cyst, or the cancer...)
He said the biopsy of my 1st lump showed both cancer and necrotic tissue. This is the only part of the appointment I didn't quite understand. What is the significance of the necrotic tissue? He didn't seem too worried about it, and what he did say was pretty much in line with
this.
He called my cancer "
invasive carcinoma with ductal and lobular features." I think the 1st area (the cancer behind the sebaceous cyst) is in the lobules (milk-producing glands), and the 2nd area (the cancer near my nipple) is in the milk ducts.
He said
I am HER2 negative, which is a good thing. He said HER2 is a growth factor, and the fact that I am negative means maybe I will not need chemotherapy.
I am also 90% ER+ (estrogen receptor positive), which means I should respond well to
hormone therapy.
Putting it all together, he said
I am stage 1. But he emphasized that much more will be known after the surgery.
The surgeon confirmed that because the cancer is
multicentric, a full mastectomy of my right breast is recommended. He said at this point, the two lumps look like 2 separate tumors, but during the surgery they may be able to see if the two are actually connected (which means there was 1 tumor that spread).
Contrary to what the
genetic counselor had said, he thought the "
variants of unknown significance" were very important. The fact that they are "unknown" means they could, possibly, be 100% linked to breast cancer, but we just don't know that yet. Those variants, combined with the history of cancer in my family (2 paternal aunts with breast cancer), and also considering the
unknown abnormality seen in the MRI of my left breast, means a double mastectomy would be a reasonable course of action. I agreed. After surgery, both breasts will be sent to the lab for testing, so ultimately we will know if there really was cancer in the left breast already.
During the surgery, it is customary to look at the
lymph nodes to see if the cancer has spread. Apparently, if breast cancer spreads outside of the breasts, the only path is through the lymph nodes. The surgeon will eject a dye into each breast. The dye will travel the same path the cancer would be likely to take. The first lymph nodes to be reached by the dye are called the "sentinel" lymph nodes. (Like they are keeping guard for the rest of the body!) The surgeon will remove 2 or 3 of these sentinel lymph nodes on each side for biopsy. Even though there is no confirmation of cancer in the left breast at this point, he will remove the left sentinel lymph nodes just in case, because once the breast is removed, there will be no way to identify the sentinel lymph nodes for future biopsy (no breast tissue in which to inject the dye).
Whether or not the sentinel lymph node biopsy shows cancer may change the staging of the cancer and will determine my course of treatment, including whether or not I need chemotherapy.
After surgery, when all the lab results are in, I will meet with a medical oncologist about chemotherapy and medication, which are considered systemic treatments for cancer. (They treat the whole body, not just the location of the cancer.)
Because my cancer is ER+, the medical oncologist may prescribe an anti-estrogen pill like
Tamoxifen, which is appropriate for pre-menopausal women. Ovarian suppression pills could also be used to prevent the ovaries from producing estrogen. Being 90% sensitive to estrogen, I asked if I should consider getting my ovaries removed? He said that's definitely something I should discuss with the medical oncologist and my OB/GYN. (Ovary removal surgery would be done by the OB/GYN.)
If necessary, I will be referred to a radiation oncologist. Radiation (like surgery) is considered local treatment for cancer tumors. A mastectomy removes the entire area of the tumor, which makes radiation less likely.
The breast surgeon said radiation is rare for a stage 1 cancer with double mastectomy. But radiation could be recommended if the tumor is greater than 5 cm, if the cancer has already spread to the lymph nodes, or if there are "
positive margins". "Surgical margins" refers to the normal breast tissue that is removed along with the cancer. "Clear" or "negative" margins means normal tissue surrounds the removed cancer. "Positive" margins means cancer cells go right up to the end of the removed tissue (which means maybe not all the cancer was removed).
Because I am not getting reconstruction, I also spoke with the breast surgeon about wanting completely flat results, i.e., no excess skin or "
dog ears". (If breast reconstruction is still a possibility, surgeons may purposely spare excess skin.) He said he understood my concern, and if there are "poor cosmetic results" after recovery, either he or a plastic surgeon could do revision surgery (a "quick nip-tuck" outpatient procedure) to fix it.
The breast surgeon offered to refer me to a plastic surgeon if I changed my mind about reconstruction. I appreciated that he was making sure I understood all my options while still respecting my decision and not pushing me in one direction or the other.
He also let me know about contoured
prosthetics that are custom-made to fit an individual's chest, so they fit and look better than other prosthetics. I haven't given much thought to prosthetics yet, but that does sound appealing. He said he'd get me the information for them (maybe a prescription?) after the surgery.
Regarding the post-surgery recovery, he said I could expect 1 night in the hospital, and then I should be functional by the time I get home. I shouldn't do any cooking or cleaning or anything like that for about a week. He estimated recovery to be 3 weeks, but no heavy lifting for up to 6 weeks. He told me about "
drains" that will collect fluid in the days following surgery. (They will be removed after 5-7 days.) I think I would have been more taken aback or confused by this revelation if I hadn't already learned about drains on the
Facebook group for women who have had double mastectomies.
Finally, we met briefly with my
biopsy nurse, who I learned is my "navigator," which means she is the person coordinating my care. She will take care of cancelling the
MRI with biopsy appointment, and she'll be the one who sets up my medical oncologist appointment. I mentioned to her my uneasiness over the fact that I had taken birth control pills for so many years. She reassured me that no studies
definitively link birth control pills to breast cancer; birth control pills may slightly increase the risk for breast cancer for some women, but there are
many factors that may influence the results.
Now, all I can do is wait for a scheduler to call with my surgery date.